Instead I try to provide information from the viewpoint of someone doing their own research and analysis into a company. It’s not about me, it’s about reviewing and analysing MLM and the various opportunities available.Īlso, anyone can post negative things about MLM companies online, and they are usually byĮxactly. Plus without proof it’s just mean spirited pseudo “journalism.”īecause the information I publish should be able to stand on its own, regardless of who I am. They may have many people who DO want to give it a shot and will actually work the business, but with negative info on the Internet it makes their chances at success harder to achieve. How about being fair in this horrible economy-give a company a chance. Like the BBB-although even with them, if you are a PAYING member you won’t get a negative report. How about being fair and making the person PROVE what they say and not put the negative info up about the company until they get a chance to make a rebuttal and/or show the “whiner” never did a darn thing to build a business. I believe there should be a process where the offending remarks can be removed if the person crying like a baby because they didn’t have the “goods” to make it in the big, bad world of MLM. Your site and others like them can ruin the reputation and business of a company without even giving them a chance.

They blame their company, their sponsor, the leads, the system, their parents, whomever or whatever rather than take responsibility that they simply didn’t get off their “sofa” and get to work.

I’m just wondering why you are “anonymous” and don’t put your identity out there.Īlso, anyone can post negative things about MLM companies online, and they are usually by someone who has joined a company, bought the “dream,” yet sat around “dreaming they’d become rich” without doing much of anything.

Primerica online default password